Tomintoul 16 Years
At the first glance the 16-year-old Tomintoul is quite similar to the 10-year-old- However, it contains more sherry cask whiskies, wich make it rounder and sweeter. Together with the longer maturation this results in a very good single malt.
At the first glance the 16-year-old Tomintoul is quite similar to the 10-year-old- However, it contains more sherry cask whiskies, wich make it rounder and sweeter. Together with the longer maturation this results in a very good single malt.
Details about this bottle | Edit |
---|---|
1752 | |
Tomintoul | |
Scotland, Speyside | |
Single Malt Whisky | |
16 Years | |
40% | |
0.7 l | |
Original bottling | |
Ex-Bourbon + Ex-Sherry | |
|
|
Average tasting notes Tasting notes |
Calculated from 58
![]()
i
|
|
---|---|---|
Nosing
Nuts:
Fruit:
Oil:
Sweet:
Malt:
Hazelnut:
Peat Smoke:
Vanilla:
Oak:
Sherry:
Herbs:
Honey:
Apple:
Zitrus:
Floral:
Spices:
Green Apple:
Pear:
Heather:
Orange:
Raisin:
Barley:
Berries:
Bonfire Smoke:
Caramel:
Chili:
Chocolate:
Cinnamon:
Dried Fruit:
Grape:
Hay:
Lemon:
Lime:
Mint:
Seaweed:
Maritime Notes:
Almonds:
Banana:
Tasting
Nuts:
Sweet:
Spices:
Fruit:
Malt:
Oak:
Oil:
Peat Smoke:
Zitrus:
Vanilla:
Caramel:
Sherry:
Herbs:
Barley:
Orange:
Herb:
Chili:
Grass:
Green Apple:
Hazelnut:
Heather:
Honey:
Nutmeg:
Maritime Notes:
Alcohol:
Almonds:
Pear:
Chocolate:
Coffee:
Dark Chocolate:
Date:
Dried Fruit:
Grapefruit:
Ham:
Hay:
Lemon:
Lemon Peel:
Seaweed:
Finish
Spices:
Oak:
Nuts:
Malt:
Sweet:
Oil:
Peat Smoke:
Fruit:
Herb:
Dark Chocolate:
Raisin:
Sherry:
Vanilla:
Walnut:
Chocolate:
Dried Fruit:
Almonds:
Barley:
Hazelnut:
|
Quality rating of this bottle
Quality comparison of bottles
i
Tasting notes of 1014481:


All tasting notes
RATING: 3.2/5.0 ≙ 81 pts



Light and fruity, pear predominantly. Red apples. Background oak aroma is almost nutty.
Taste:




Sweet arrival, fruitiness and citrus fruit. Vanilla custard. There's a slight graininess which I usually associate with younger whiskies.
Finish:



Medium length. Oaky with mild spiciness, residual fruit. Relatively non descript, surprisingly dry for a relatively sweet whisky.
Comment:
An interesting one this, very fruit led throughout. Reminds me a lot of younger Glenlivet, Glenfiddich and Glenmorangie, but with more wood involvement. Its definitely easy drinking stuff, but lacks the intensity of flavour that I look for personally, also the finish is a little one dimensional. Got to say that for a 16 year old the price is very reasonable though, and I'd take it over the aforementioned standard releases any day. Probably not one I'll come back to, but pretty good.