Kilchoman 2017 Machir Bay - 46% - 0.7l
| Details about this bottle | Edit |
|---|---|
| 18843 | |
| Kilchoman | |
| Scotland, Islay | |
| Single Malt Whisky | |
| 46% | |
| 0.7 l | |
| Original bottling | |
| Bourbon | |
| Sherry - Oloroso | |
|
|
Quality rating of this bottle
3.8
Rate
4
3
Quality comparison of bottles
i
Tasting notes of TheGreatMothra:
20. Jun 2019
Nosing: 
Sweet peat smoke, honey.
Taste: 
Sweet arrival, remains relatively sweeth throughout. Medium to high peat usage, nothing over the top. Some light liquorice flavours coming through. Salty tang.
Finish: 
Finishes medium to long and fairly sweet. Black pepper and peat
Comment:
This is very similar in my books to Lagavulin 16. It differs primarily in that it isn't as fruity and is peated slightly lighter. It does however come across as quite a bit sweeter. In all honesty, there's a lot to like about it. It is a fairly straightforward NAS whisky with a good belt of peat. Not over the top in complexity, but reasonably priced (£43) at the time of writing. Some people have said it has a heavy marine character, but I don't really get that other than a saltiness on the palate. Worth a try.
Sweet peat smoke, honey.
Taste:
Sweet arrival, remains relatively sweeth throughout. Medium to high peat usage, nothing over the top. Some light liquorice flavours coming through. Salty tang.
Finish:
Finishes medium to long and fairly sweet. Black pepper and peat
Comment:
This is very similar in my books to Lagavulin 16. It differs primarily in that it isn't as fruity and is peated slightly lighter. It does however come across as quite a bit sweeter. In all honesty, there's a lot to like about it. It is a fairly straightforward NAS whisky with a good belt of peat. Not over the top in complexity, but reasonably priced (£43) at the time of writing. Some people have said it has a heavy marine character, but I don't really get that other than a saltiness on the palate. Worth a try.
All tasting notes
08. May 2020
20. Jun 2019
Nosing:
Sweet peat smoke, honey.
Taste:
Sweet arrival, remains relatively sweeth throughout. Medium to high peat usage, nothing over the top. Some light liquorice flavours coming through. Salty tang.
Finish:
Finishes medium to long and fairly sweet. Black pepper and peat
Comment:
This is very similar in my books to Lagavulin 16. It differs primarily in that it isn't as fruity and is peated slightly lighter. It does however come across as quite a bit sweeter. In all honesty, there's a lot to like about it. It is a fairly straightforward NAS whisky with a good belt of peat. Not over the top in complexity, but reasonably priced (£43) at the time of writing. Some people have said it has a heavy marine character, but I don't really get that other than a saltiness on the palate. Worth a try.
Sweet peat smoke, honey.
Taste:
Sweet arrival, remains relatively sweeth throughout. Medium to high peat usage, nothing over the top. Some light liquorice flavours coming through. Salty tang.
Finish:
Finishes medium to long and fairly sweet. Black pepper and peat
Comment:
This is very similar in my books to Lagavulin 16. It differs primarily in that it isn't as fruity and is peated slightly lighter. It does however come across as quite a bit sweeter. In all honesty, there's a lot to like about it. It is a fairly straightforward NAS whisky with a good belt of peat. Not over the top in complexity, but reasonably priced (£43) at the time of writing. Some people have said it has a heavy marine character, but I don't really get that other than a saltiness on the palate. Worth a try.
04. Jun 2019
12. May 2018
