![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
After a much promised visit to Scotland and a trip to the Edradour distillery, my wife and I are now converted to whisky. Amongst the advice given on the tour was that a good whisky should be a least 10 years old and non-chilled filtered as this retained all the flavourful oils. However, after perusing many different brands of whisky, the bottles that proudly proclame "Non- chill filtered" do not give their age. Whereas those that give an age do not say if they are chill filtered or not. Does anybody know the reason?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
It sounds more like a coincidence that you're seeing bottles of whisky with no age statement and non-chillfiltered. All of these have age statements and mention non-chillfiltered: Ardbeg 10, Bowmore 16 Limited Edition, Benriach 15 wood finishes. And by the way, not to discount what you were told regarding nothing less than a 10 year to be a good whisky.....friend and whisky expert Tom says - "NO WAY! For example the “young” series Ardbegs at 7-9 yrs, the PC5-6-7-8 series, a fantastic 6 yr old “Badger” (Bruichladdich) I picked up from Milroy’s, the new Kilchoman, which I actually tried at less than 3 years, and let’s not forget about McCarthy’s from Oregon (3 yrs I think)."
Anyone else want to chime in here? Anyone? Anyone?!
__________________
Jojo Whisky.com |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dont think it says anywhere about it being an English exclusive, but the Big Chill organiser said, "Im delighted that they have chosen to reform for the Big Chill" - so take that into context and I imagine that their festival appearance will be there; followed by Connect, Electric Picnic and Bestival perhaps? V Festival at a push.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
NEVER, NEVER, but NEVER listen to anyone who makes a statement such as a "good whisky should be a least 10 years old and non-chilled filtered as this retained all the flavourful oils." These kind of statements are usually made by tour guides who add editorial comments to an alread CANNED talk for a tour. Respectfully, these people are either part time looking for a little extra money, a college student or a retired person looking to fill in their day. For the most part they know nothing about whisky. I DO prefer NON-CHILL FILTERED whiskies as they do retain complexity, but the statement "at least 10 years old" respectfully is rubbish.
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| cold filtered, non-chill filtered |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Chill Filtered? | Niklaus | Single Malt Scotch Whisky | 2 | 06-02-2010 02:19 PM |