![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm thinking about picking up a bottle of Brora 30-year-old single malt but I'm undecided between several of their "editions" or "releases", namely the 2004 ("3rd" edition/release?), 2007 or 2009. Due to the high prices of these 30-year-olds I'm limited to buying ONE bottle (yes, wouldn't we all like to have each year's release!!), so I want to be sure I'm making the best overall choice. Is there an appreciable difference between years, aside from the ABV, type of cask, etc. - or are they all good, and worth the $$$? (Maybe a subjective question.) Any experts care to weigh in?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
The 2004 is the best of all the releases imho. It's definitely the peatiest of the series and has huge farmy notes.
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 30 year old, brora, clynelish |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|